Quo Fata Ferunt! QFF! Die ECHTE Illuminati shit... Welkom in de Hel! - complotten, ufo's, karma, illuminati, nonsens, wetenschap, kennis en verlichting! QFF

Aanpassen
A+ R A- wide normal
Registreren Inloggen
  • Skip to content
QFF »
  • Over QFF
  • F.A.Q.'s
  • Contact
  • QFFsummary
  • Forum 
  • Qommunity 
  • contactwith us
  • Zoeken 
donderdag, 28 april 2011 18:44
Beoordeel dit artikel
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
(6 stemmen)

Geboortecertificaat Obama nep?

  • door  Baphomet
  • lettergrootte verklein lettergrootte verklein lettergrootte vergroot lettergrootte vergroot lettergrootte
  • Afdrukken
  • E-mail

Het is een ieder van ons hier op QFF vast niet ontgaan dat Donald Trump al een tijdje moeilijk aan het doen was vanwege het geboortecertificaat van Obama. Gisteren kwam Obama met een reactie en toonde het Witte Huis zijn geboortecertificaat. Voor de meeste mensen was het daarmee klaar.



Maar Vandaag zal ik op ATS wat rond te klikken toen ik tegen een artikel aanliep waarin iemand claimde dat er ergens CIA op het geboortecertificaat van Obama zou staan. Aangezien ik dagelijks mijn dag aanvang met het opstarten van Adobe Software in verband met mijn werk was het voor mij een fluitje van een cent om te checken of dat verhaal wat er op ATS stond wel klopte! Maar nadat ik zojuist het originele document opende in Adobe Photoshop CS5 constateerde ik dat het klopt! Er staat verdomme echt CIA in de schaduw van het document.

Kijkt U even mee?

Klik hier voor het originele document wat ik geopend heb in Photoshop.

Na het openen van het document heb ik er voor gekozen de kleurwaarden om te keren, het resultaat daarvan ziet er zo uit:



Opeens zie je dan vaag in de achtergrond lichte contrasten van tekst. Links naast Hussein zie je duidelijk de letters CIA...

Ook Alex Jones heeft zijn verhaal over het certificaat al klaar en samengevat in de onderstaande video op Youtube...



Wat de neuQ? Op deze wijze krijg ik wel degelijk twijfels over de echtheid van dit document. Heeft Trump dan toch gelijk? Wie het weet mag het zeggen... Dus roept U maar!

Laatst gewijzigd op: donderdag, 28 april 2011 19:08
Reacties op artikel:
2 jaren geleden door baphomet #31030
En zelfs de PDF is inderdaad bewerkt!!

www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf
2 jaren geleden door baphomet #31031


2 jaren geleden door Dromen #31032
Heeft ook een keer een heel artikel over in de KIJK gestaan. Ik vind het wel erg vergezocht hoor...

Even tegengas:
www.geenstijl.nl/mt/archieven/2011/04/live_white_house_publiceert_bi.html
2 jaren geleden door baphomet #31033
Dit is een document dat gister voor het eerst gepubliceerd is, wat jij bedoeld is iets anders Dromen en geloof mij dit bestand is niet echt en er is oprecht mee gekloot, dat durf ik met meer dan 15 jaar Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Illustrator, Adobe Indesign, Painter, CorelDraw, Quarck Xpress etc. wel te stellen jah!

Hoe dom kun je zijn om dat zo online te zetten??



Of is it all part of the game??
2 jaren geleden door combi #31034
ff van het dumpie hier naar toe:

Who, What, Why: Why the II in Barack Obama's name?
28 April 2011 Last updated at 14:37 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-13221643



The US president's birth certificate names him as "Barack Hussein Obama, II". Why does he qualify for the Roman numerals?

When the president released his long-form birth certificate on Wednesday, the focus was on his place of birth, to confirm what most people already knew - he was born in the US.

But it also shone a light on a rarely used part of his name, the II at the end.

The reason for it is, at root, quite simple - the US president has been given his father's name, Barack Hussein Obama. In societies where this is common practice, a method of distinguishing between fathers and sons (and sometimes grandfathers too) is useful.

In the US the son will usually be known as Joe Bloggs Junior. For example, Al Gore, the former US vice-president, is Albert Arnold Gore Jr, because his father was also Albert Arnold Gore.

oe Bloggs II would typically be used when a son is named after a relative other than his father - his grandfather, for example. However, it is also used, sometimes, as an alternative to Joe Bloggs Jr.

This is what the Behind the Name website has to say on the subject of Jr v II.

"Junior is used to distinguish a son with the same name as his father. The following conditions apply:

1. The Junior must be a son of the father, not a grandson.

2. The names must be exactly the same, including the middle name.

3. The father must still be living.

"'II' is used whenever any close relative, including for example a grandfather or a great-uncle, shares the same name as the child."
Kenyan tradition

Miss Manners' Guide to Excruciatingly Correct Behavior, written by Judith Martin, takes the same line:

"The oldest living William Wellborn is numberless, and one starts counting Junior, III, IV (or 3d, 4th, a form Miss Manners prefers), and so on from there."

So according to Behind the Name and Miss Manners, the US president should definitely have been Barack Obama Jr, rather than Barack Hussein Obama II.

Is his name, therefore, excruciatingly incorrect?

Actually, it seems there are plenty of IIs in the US who have been named after their father.

"It's normally Junior, but it can be II," says Sharon Manitta, a spokesman in the UK for Democrats Abroad, whose brother is a Junior and who once dated a III. "It doesn't really matter."

The decision to put "II" rather than "Jr" on the birth certificate may not have been the parents' choice, she adds. It could have been taken by the Hawaiian official who registered the birth.

Barack Obama's Kenyan father would have been perfectly comfortable with the idea of passing on his own name to his son - it is a practice common not only in the US, but in his own country too, and especially among the Luo tribe, to which he belonged.

But there too, it would be normal to use the word "Junior" to refer to the son, according to the BBC's Noel Mwakugu in Nairobi.
The comma?

In the US, things change slightly once the third Joe Bloggs in a series comes along. Then even those who began as Juniors may become IIs.
Continue reading the main story
“Start Quote

VI is the furthest down the line I have come across”

Sharon Manitta Democrats Abroad

"The designation of Sr or Jr to distinguish between father and son with all the exact same names (first, middle, & last), can be replaced by the Roman numerals, I and II, respectively, when the grandson has the exact same names," explain Dr Dave and Dr Dee, who provide advice on health, medicine, relationships, families, etiquette, manners and fashion.

"The grandson will then have a III after his name. The grandfather and father can continue to use Sr and Jr, respectively, or the numerals."

According to Sharon Manitta, the bigger numbers tend to be used mostly in swankier sections of society.

"Juniors are all over the place, but if it's getting painful - VI is the furthest down the line I have come across - then it's usually an upper-class family," she says.

Observant readers will note that Barack Obama's birth certificate also has a comma between the "Obama" and the "II".

Is this excruciatingly correct, or not? On this point, the authorities disagree. The Chicago Manual of Style is against the comma. Dundee Printing (For Life's Special Moments) is in favour.

At any rate, it seems unlikely to disqualify Barack Obama from holding the presidency.
2 jaren geleden door ThaViking #31051
Of het was al vals en hebben het gedumped op hoop van zegen omdat ze niks anders hadden...Maar erg vaag zon bewerkt copietje plaatsen. Lijkt me niet zo moeilijk toch een onbewerkt fotocopietje plaatsen.

Of Obama wil weg voordat ie helemaal door de mand valt met zijn mooie beloftes van voor zijn aantreden, en doet ie dat zo en creeert gelijk nog wat verwarring bij heel veel mensen met de hoop dat er probleempjes uit ontstaan die weer opgelost moeten worden .
Ben benieuwd of er nog een ander certificaat tevoorschijn komt. Maar vage peop...
2 jaren geleden door Het Dolle Eland #31054
In de tv serie The Event, loopt er nu ook zo'n draadje (Firts Lady is in dit geval de verdachte).
2 jaren geleden door BL@DE #31108
Nou ik geloof niet dat het echt is...waarom heeft het jaren moeten duren?

Als iemand twijfels heeft en je kan ze meteen oplossen door even je geboortebewijs te laten zien, doe je dat in die functie toch?
2 jaren geleden door baphomet #31491
RED ALERT!!! Massive cover-up underway in the White House! Natural Born Citizen Definition SCRUBBED FROM ALL ONLINE DICTIONARIES!!!
Suggest Unpin Quote [+]
Your Ad Here

Ladies and gentlemen, there is a MASSIVE cover-up underway.

BOTH Natural born AND natural born citizen now return NO RESULTS in searches on ALL active online dictionaries, with the sole exception of Wikipedia, redirects to Wikipedia, and quotes from Wikipedia.

::Correction::

[It has been pointed out to me that there are still one or two dictionaries, Oxford in particular, that still has a definition for Natural Born. Natural Born Citizen still seems to be missing.]

Natural Born Citizen

[link to dictionary.cambridge.org]

[link to www.merriam-webster.com]

[link to www.webster-dictionary.org]

[link to oxforddictionaries.com]

[link to www.onelook.com]

[link to encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com]

[link to www.yourdictionary.com]

[link to wordcentral.com]

[link to www.ldoceonline.com]

[link to nhd.heinle.com]

[link to encarta.msn.com]

[link to www.hyperdictionary.com]

[link to www.macmillandictionary.com]

Proof that at least Oxford USED to have a definition:

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

This is some serious shit. Before Obama released his "long form" birth certificate last week, you could go to ANY online dictionary and view the definition of Natural Born Citizen, which is (roughly) as follows:

Nat|u|ral Born (Nach'er el Born', Nach'rel-), adj.

1 That is so by nature, born so: a natural born boxer, a natural born fool. 2 Native of a country; not alien: a natural born citizen or subject.

Photos of my own dictionary, World Book Edition copyright 1981:

[link to i863.photobucket.com]

[link to i863.photobucket.com]

[link to i863.photobucket.com]


The reason this is important is because right now, there is an ongoing debate over at Wikipedia due to the scrubbing of references to Emerich De Vattel's work Law of Nations, right after Obama released his long form.

[link to en.wikipedia.org]

They have maintained here that since Vattel wrote in French, and his exact wording for Natural-Born is, "Les Naturales ou indigenes" which literally translated would mean "the naturals or natives", Vattel can not be used as a reference for the wording of the Constitutional requirement of Natural Born Citizenship. But, Vattel's definition (in English) is as follows:

[link to www.constitution.org]

§ 212. Citizens and natives.

The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

Regardless of Vattels original wording, it should be obvious to any critical thinker that if he was talking about "naturals" and defining who they were, it was to take as self explanatory that 1) these individuals had been born, and 2) they were citizens. And considering that natural, native, and Indigenous are all synonymous, It can not be disputed that Vattel was speaking about a person who's citizenship falls naturally upon them by virtue of birth, or to put it another way, a Natural Born Citizen. This work has been cited extensively by our forefathers, as can be witnessed in this video:



There can be NO disputing the fact that the definition of Natural Born Citizen is indeed one who is born to TWO parents, who are BOTH citizens. It is now undeniable that there is a very serious cover-up going on regarding this Constitutional requirement. I wish to point out the VERY RAPID succession of events that occurred over the last week:

April 27th

In response to growing demands to release his long form birth certificate, Obama finally reveals it to the public.

April 3oth

Obama appears in front of guests and on national TV at the White House Correspondence dinner to gloat in triumph over the release of this Long Form Birth Certificate, even as concern grows over the real issue, his Natural Born Citizenship Status.

May 1st

In a MAJOR political move, Obama appears on live TV to announce the death of Osama Bin Laden earlier that day.

People, this is a CUT AND DRY "Wag the Dog" Scenario! Our government has known Bin Laden's whereabouts for at least five years, but they have been keeping him alive for a "Politically Expedient Moment". That moment came last Sunday, and was used to distract the publics attention once and for all from his eligibility. The birth certificate NEVER WAS THE ISSUE! And with the disappearance of the definition from online dictionaries, there can be no refuting that SOMEBODY IS HIDING SOMETHING!

I CAN NOT STRESS THIS ENOUGH: The REAL issue concerning Obama's eligibility is and ALWAYS HAS BEEN, his Natural Born Status! Since his father was a Kenyan national and NEVER held US citizenship, OBAMA CAN NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT! The Birth certificate as I have ALWAYS maintained, was a distraction. But since that Distraction was discarded on the 27th, Bin Laden was given to use to replace it! Look at the facts:

Obama created the conspiracy theory about his PLACE OF BIRTH by deliberately refusing to release the long form, for the sole purpose of distracting us from the REAL issue. He let it build for 3 years, going so far as to imprison Terrence Lakin for demanding proof of Obama's eligibility. Focus began to shift this spring to the Natural Born requirement, and people began to point out the fact that he does not meet this requirement. When he finally released the Birth Certificate, he stated quite explicitly that “I know that theres going to be a segment of people for which, no matter what we put out, this issue will not be put to rest”. After a moment of triumph, Obama delivers up to us another mystery. Osama Bin Laden is dead, but we disposed of the body, and we WILL NOT be releasing any photographic proof of our claim. He then goes on to state that, "There are going to be some folks who deny it. The fact of the matter is you won't see bin Laden walking on this earth again."

This is THE EXACT SAME SCENARIO he used with the Birth Certificate! He has created a second distraction to keep you away from his eligibility. The refusal to provide evidence of Bin Ladens death WILL create conspiracy theories, and THAT is what Obama is hedging his bets on. He has given us Bin Laden to keep us distracted!

IT'S A FUCKING COVER-UP, PEOPLE!

Bron: www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1477742/pg1

2 jaren geleden door Vrillon #31494
Ik zie het probleem niet dat een buitenlander president kan worden.. maar dan moet dat natuurlijk wel aangegeven worden..
Waarom de cia niet gewoon een amerikaan heeft gekozen weet k niet, misschien was obama de enige neger die ze hadden om president te worden.
2 jaren geleden door combi #31499
Vrillon schreef:
Ik zie het probleem niet dat een buitenlander president kan worden.. maar dan moet dat natuurlijk wel aangegeven worden..
Waarom de cia niet gewoon een amerikaan heeft gekozen weet k niet, misschien was obama de enige neger die ze hadden om president te worden.


Of al dat geroeptoeter over of Obomba wel niet Amerikanski is, leid mooi de aandacht af van alles en nog wat en dat komt de cia vast wel goed uit.


2 jaren geleden door Melkor #31501
Vrillon schreef:
Ik zie het probleem niet dat een buitenlander president kan worden..

Omdat het de wet is. De president dient een geboren Amerikaan te zijn.

Daarnaast is de USA uiteraard aardig patriotisch dus het land laten lijden* door een buitenlander is toch enigszins 'not done'



(*intended misspelling)
2 jaren geleden door Vrillon #31507
@melkor
Snats ik.. Maar het is toch onzin.. als ik daar kom en zeg ik ben dan wel geboren in nederland maar ik wil president worden, dit is mijn programma.. Dan is het toch aan die amerikanen om op mij te stemmen of niet..
2 jaren geleden door baphomet #31508
Die regel is ooit ingevoerd om te voorkomen dat iemand vanuit het Britse Koningshuis naar Amerika zou kunnen komen om daar vervolgens een campagne op te kunnen zetten en zo president te kunnen worden...

Dat gaat dus al zo ver terug als het ontstaan van de VS...

Maar ik las ook ergens dat men de regels geheel onopvallend in 2006 veranderd zou hebben... (heeft met Obama ingedekt?)
2 jaren geleden door Vrillon #31510
Maar het zijn wel allemaal afstammelingen van koning john.. quofataferunt.com/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=908:united-states-of-king-john-?
2 jaren geleden door Melkor #31512
Vrillon schreef:
@melkor
Snats ik.. Maar het is toch onzin.. als ik daar kom en zeg ik ben dan wel geboren in nederland maar ik wil president worden, dit is mijn programma.. Dan is het toch aan die amerikanen om op mij te stemmen of niet..


Daar heb je'n punt...
2 jaren geleden door combi #31918


if Barrack Obama is the president's adopted name why is that the name listed on his so-called birth certificate ?
2 jaren geleden door Snorbaard Telex #32300
Ik vind de hele kwestie niet zo heel boeiend, maar wat toch wel frappant is:

Waarom horen we nix meer van de man met de dode cavia op zijn hoofd?
En waarom is het presidentschap ook plotseling niet meer zo boeiend voor meneer?
(Overigens heeft Trump wel eens vaker geflirt met het presidentschap en is toen toch maar weer afgehaakt, zal wel een ego dingetje zijn. )

Of is ie teruggefloten...?



edit: oeps, er stond al wat in het Trumptopic
2 jaren geleden door Neut #32301
Lijkt mij dat je Pie bedoelt.
2 jaren geleden door baphomet #32507
A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY

The dead infant and the birth-certificate mystery

Researcher who suspects forgery finds possible reason for Obama registration number

NEW YORK – Amid questions about the authenticity of Obama's posted birth records raised by the registration number, a researcher has discovered a possible explanation.

The Post and Email blog, which has focused on the Obama eligibility controversy, features a report by an unnamed researcher who discovered the record of a girl born the same day as the president who died a day later that could have been the source of Obama's birth certificate.

The find is significant because of questions about the plausibility of the registration number indicated on the images of short-form and long-form birth certificates for the president posted on the Internet.

As WND reported, the numbers on the published Hawaii birth certificates of twins Susan and Gretchen Nordyke are lower than the number given Obama, even though the president's birth certificate was accepted by the registrar general and stamped with a certificate number three days earlier. Further, as WND reported yesterday, an article by the man who was Hawaii's registrar general at the time Obama was born confirmed birth certificates were numbered immediately upon acceptance by the registrar general.

Jerome Corsi's new book, "Where's the Birth Certificate?", is now available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore

The researcher found documentation for Virginia Sunahara's birth on the morning of Aug. 4, 1961, at Wahiawa General Hospital in Wahiawa, Oahu. She was the daughter of Hawaii-born Tomio Sunahara, a postal clerk of Japanese ancestry who fought for the U.S. in World War II, and his wife, Clara.

The infant developed complications and most likely was transferred to Kapi'olani Women and Children's Medical Center in Honolulu, although the hospital could have been Queens Medical Center. She died on Aug. 5, 1961.


Sunahara grave marker at Miliani Memorial Gardens in Waipahu, Hawaii (Courtesy My Very Own Point of View)

WND contacted Virginia's mother Clara, 83, who is living in Wahiawa on Oahu.

Clara told WND by telephone she did not have Virginia's birth certificate and she was not interested in applying to the Hawaii Department of Health to see what birth records might be on file regarding her daughter.

The researchers reported that newly born Virginia Sunahara was transferred to a Honolulu hospital from Wahiawa General Hospital because she was having trouble breathing. The Honolulu hospitals were considered to have better equipment to deal with neonatal birth complications.

Virginia Sunahara's vital records have been located in the Hawaii birth and death records, as shown here:



And here:



No birth announcement appeared for Virginia Sunahara in either Honolulu newspaper.

A death announcement for the girl, under the name of her father, Tomio Sunahara, appeared in the Honolulu Advertiser on Aug. 8, 1961, and in the Honolulu Star-Bulletin on Aug. 14, 1961.

The researchers who discovered Virginia Sunahara's birth record speculated that at the time of her death, her parents had not yet selected her name.

The timing of the newspaper death notice may have resulted from the fact that Hawaii law requires the registration of a death within three days and the registration of a birth within seven days.

The researchers further speculated that by the time the birth certificate was submitted by the hospital to the local registrar at the Hawaii Department of Health, Clara and Tomio had decided on the name Virginia, and the Department of Health updated its records accordingly.

This would explain why the newspaper death announcements listed the name as Tomiyo Sunahara, while the official Hawaii death records list the child's name as Virginia.

With an Aug. 4, 1961, birthdate, it's possible Virginia Sunahara's birth registration was filed as late as Aug. 11, 1961 – the same day the Nordyke twins' birth certificates were filed by Kapi'olani hospital with the Hawaii Department of Health local registrar and registrar general.

Susan Nordyke, the twin born first, received birth certificate number 10637; Gretchen Nordyke, the second, received number 10638.

Barack Obama's birth certificate was issued the number 10641, even though it was registered three days before the Nordykes' certificates.

However, if the birth certificate number 10641 was first assigned to Virginia Sunahara, the apparent conflict could be explained.

Is it possible that if Obama's birth records were forged, the perpetrator used Virginia Sunahara's birth certificate number, knowing the girl was long dead and the family was unlikely to know or complain?

Virginia Sunahara was initially buried Sept. 28, 1961, at the National Memorial Cemetery of the Pacific, also known as the Punchbowl, at 2177 Puowaina Drive in Honolulu, in Section U Site 966-F.

Her father died March 26, 1968, and Virginia was disinterred and re-buried alongside her father's cremated remains at Mililani Memorial Park in Waipahu in October 1968.

Bron: www.wnd.com/?pageId=300201

Lees ook dit...

Research Summary on Hawaii Birth Certificate Number 151-1961-010641

WHERE DID THE NUMBER COME FROM?

(May 13, 2011) — Editor’s Note: The following report was compiled by the person who traveled to Hawaii last July and reported her findings to The Post & Email shortly thereafter.

According to the COLB posted on www.factcheck.org/ for Mr. Obama, his birth certificate number is 151-1961-010641. The number was allegedly assigned when his birth certificate was allegedly filed with the State Registrar on August 8, 1961. The Nordyke twins, whose original long-form birth certificates were posted on the internet, are identified as file numbers 151-1961-010637 and 151-1961-010638 respectively, and were assigned and accepted by the State Registrar on August 11, 1961. I am in possession of an email dated February 3, 2010 in which Ms. Okubo stated that the certificate numbers were assigned by the State Registrar and only in the main DoH office located on Oahu (Honolulu).
Based on this information, it is not possible that 151-1961-010641 was assigned three days earlier than were 151-1961-010637 and 151-1961-010638. The file number 010641 was likely assigned on Friday, August 11, 1961 and no later than Monday, August 14, 1961.
A small group of researchers that I work with identified an infant girl named Virginia Sunahara, born on August 4, 1961 at Wahiawa Hospital in Wahiawa, Oahu, HI. Due to complications, she was transferred to and later died at Kapiolani Women and Children’s Medical Center (most likely) on August 5, 1961. This happens to coincide with date of birth and birthplace of the Nordyke twins. Assuming that her medical records were also transferred to Kapiolani, the birth certificate likely originated at Kapiolani and was included in the group of birth certificates that contained the Nordyke twins.

a. Born the morning of August 4, 1961 at Wahiawa Hospital, Wahiawa, Oahu, HI.

b. Due to complications, the infant was transferred to hospital in Honolulu. Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children is the most likely; however, Queens Medical Center is also a possibility.

c. Died at Kapiolani the morning of August 5, 1961.

d. Death notice appears in the Honolulu Star Advertiser on August 8, 1961 and the Honolulu Star-Bulletin on August 14, 1961 for Tomiyo Sunahara; no birth announcement was published.

e. Interred at National Cemetery of the Pacific, aka Punchbowl in Sept. 1961.

f. One researcher requested verification from the Veterans Administration that Virginia Sunahara was interred in plot U-966F (Sunahara listed as buried here. See: www.interment.net/data/us/hi/oahu/natmem/hawaii_stosv.htm) and was informed that there were no records responsive to her request. The gravesite in question was allegedly occupied by James T. Sawamura. I visited Punchbowl on July 21, 2010 to confirm. I went into the office to obtain information about plot number U-966-F. Virginia Sunahara was not listed in the database; the clerk showed me the computer screen. The database indicates that James T. Sawamura is buried there. Born Jul 23 1926; Died Oct 14 1980.

g. The same researcher made a UIPA request from the DoH for an abbreviated, non-certified copy of the Sunahara COLB per the DoH Public Health Regulation Chapter 8B and was informed “no records exist that were responsive to her request,” which is the UIPA equivalent response that this person did or does not exist, according to the DoH. The correct response based on previous requests for other abbreviated, non-certified copies of the COLB, is “denied per HRS 338-18” since the requester “does not have a direct and tangible interest.” PHR Chapter 8B does however allow the release of such information but the DoH thus far refuses to comply.

h. I personally visited the DOH Office in Honolulu on July 21, 2010 and found Virginia Sunahara’s name in both the birth and death indexes spanning 1960-1964.

i. The research team did some footwork and determined the following: The father, Tomio Sunahara, was cremated and interred at the Mililani Memorial Gardens. Born Oct 13 1924; Died Mar 26 1968.

j. I visited the Sunahara birth address of xxxxxxxxxxxxxx. I approached the door where I could hear Fox News blaring in the background and knocked. A 50ish man in a pair of swim trunks, no shirt, answered the door. The man at the door was Virginia’s brother, xxxxxxx.

k. I asked if xxxxxx, Virginia’s mother was home, and he asked me what the purpose of my visit was. I explained that I was researching infant deaths in 1961 and that I had attempted to visit Virginia’s gravesite at the National Cemetery but I could not locate it. He confirmed his father Tomio was buried at Mililani (which is no more than 5 miles from Wahiawa) and that Virginia was buried with him. I asked again if I could speak with the mother and he took me to a room located behind the carport and knocked on the door. The mother was asleep but awoke and came to the door. He left me with the mother and returned to the house. I explained again that I was researching infant deaths and wanted some details regarding the death of Virginia. This is what I got:

i. Tomiyo/Virginia Sunahara was born the morning of Aug 4 1961 at Wahiawa General Hospital.

ii. She was having difficulty breathing and they transferred her to a hospital in Honolulu. Mrs. Sunahara did not remember which one but I assume it was Kapiolani since it is was more likely equipped to handle neonatal complications. She also could not recall where she was taken or who the physician was. You have to keep in mind that she is 83 years old, and this event occurred 50 years ago.

iii. Virginia survived less than a day which likely places the time of death sometime in the early AM of Aug 5 1961.

iv. I asked I could see the birth/death documentation and she said she could not remember if she even had it. Even if she did, given the condition of the house, I seriously doubt that she would have been able locate it.

v. I expressed my condolences to the mother regarding her loss, thanked her for the information and then left.

l. I called a member of the research team and asked them to find out where Mililani Gardens were located. After I left Wahiawa to head back toward Honolulu, I saw an exit for Mililani and exited. I stopped at the public library and obtained driving directions.

m. In the meantime, the research team member contacted the mortuary and confirmed that Virginia was indeed buried there with her father, Tomio as was her brother Stephen who passed away in 2002. According to mortuary, Virginia’s remains were dug up at the National Cemetery October 1968 and placed with her father’s, Tomio Sunahara.

I drove to the cemetery and stopped at the first office I came to and obtained the plot location. I explained that I was researching infant deaths from 1961 and asked if it was possible to view Virginia’s birth and death documentation (which was likely transferred to the mortuary when her remains were transferred). I was informed that I could not see the documentation due to legal and privacy concerns.
I located the gravesite. Again, by all appearances, this has been here for quite some time. There is zero evidence that this grave marker is a recent addition.
During my visit to the DoH office in Honolulu on July 20, 2010. I examined and made images of various index books:

a. The 1955-1959 birth index

b. The 1960-1964 birth index

c. The 1960-1964 death index

d. The 1960-1965 marriage index by Groom

e. The 1966-1970 marriage index by Groom

f. The 1960-1965 marriage index by Bride

All of the index books with the exception of the 1960-1964 birth index included the date range in the header on each page. My analysis is that there is a canned report the Vital Records department can run for the various indexes based on a specified date range and it is one of the parameters included when the report is printed. The fact that the 1960-1964 index lacks the date range in the header is a good indication that a custom report was generated to include Mr. Obama. His name was either somehow inserted or a report was created to include all births registered between the years of 1960-1964 and Mr. Obama. I have no doubt that the DoH has some sort of birth registration for Mr. Obama; however, his birth was likely registered sometime after 1964 or it is either a late/delayed or foreign birth registration.
During my visit I spoke with “Jesse the Vital Records Supervisor” and asked him if the birth indexes included foreign/out-of-state births, Hawaiian Births, and Late/Delayed Registration Births and I was informed no, that they included only the births that met the general birth criteria. I asked to see the aforementioned and I was told they did not exist or were not available. This is in direct conflict with the DoH Specific Records Retention Schedule items VDR-10, VDR-6, VDR-1. The Post & Email was able to obtain pages from the Certificate of Hawaiian Birth Index from Ms. Okubo, so its existence has already been confirmed. I asked if I could obtain a copy of a specific person’s index data and I was informed no, that it would contain too much information. I asked if I could obtain a redacted copy that included only information that appears in the index books (vital event, name and gender), and again, I was informed no.

Summary/Analysis:

The VA cemetery records were most likely computerized sometime in the late 1970’s or early 1980’s. Virginia’s data was erroneously entered into the database at that point and time.
According a fellow researcher, an audit of the burial records was to have been performed around 2003. Either Punchbowl cemetery neglected to perform the audit, or it at least failed to verify Virginia’s records. In or after 2006, Virginia’s burial record was removed from the VA database.
None of the databases that have been offered as evidence e.g. Find A Grave, Burial Internment, usgov.org are the actual VA database. They are just a snapshot of what the VA had on record at a particular point and time. It is not clear how long it takes for these auxiliary databases to self-correct or if they ever do.
Also, I believe that there was no official name change from Tomiyo to Virginia. According HRS 338, death certificates must be received by the DoH within three days. The Sunaharas probably had not selected a name for the baby prior to her death. The timeframe for submittal for a birth certificate is not as stringent (seven days). By the time the birth certificate was submitted, they decided on the name Virginia and the DoH updated its records accordingly for the death certificate. It is rare the issuance of a death certificate precedes a birth registration so the DoH likely retroactively updated its death record in regard to the first name.
If Virginia’s certificate number is 151-1961-010641, it was likely processed at the DoH on the 11th and no later than the 14th, based on the Nordyke twins’ certificate numbers (010637 and 010638) and the date they were processed, which was the 11th. We know that the DoH assigns a numerically sequential certificate number when it is received and accepted/filed. In other words, it is not pre-printed on a form that is distributed to all the HI hospitals. It is only way it can control the sequential numbering of the births otherwise the certificate numbers would be all over the place.
The delay of the internment at the National Cemetery that is assumed to have occurred on Sept 28, 1961 (based on the VA database snapshots in 2006) most likely had to with how long it took the Sunaharas to obtain approval from the VA to bury Virginia’s remains there. She was either embalmed, then held in cold storage at the mortuary that handled the remains, or she was cremated and the Sunaharas held her remains until such time that she could be interned at the National Cemetery. The latter makes the most sense, and cremation is a common method of handling remains in Asian culture.


Bron: www.thepostemail.com/2011/05/13/research-summary-on-hawaii-birth-certificate-number-151-1961-010641/
2 jaren geleden door baphomet #32532
www.trunews.com/Audio/5_18_11_wednesday_trunews2.mp3

Luister dat interview... erg interessant!! Met name vanaf een minuut of 18...
1 jaar, 12 maanden geleden door baphomet #32565
1 jaar, 12 maanden geleden door Neut #32591
Ladies and gentlemen, I got me..
1 jaar, 11 maanden geleden door combi #33662
1 jaar, 11 maanden geleden door combi #34295
Debt Collector: Michelle Obama Tied to Social Security Number Belonging to Guadalupe Megndenez



LINKS: "Al" the debt collector gives another explosive interview about his findings regarding Obama's shady past and his Chicago property tax ordeal. If you recall "Al" first reported that Obama's Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants is also tied to an Alias of Harrison J Bounel. "Al" now reports that when he searches the databases some of the prior hits are not showing up and believes the databases are being scrubbed.

"Al" also reports he discovered more properties and SS numbers connected to Barack and Michelle Obama. "Al" reports that Michelle Obama is tied to a Social Security number belonging to a 91 year-old Texas woman named "?Guadalupe Megndenez?". Many more unbelievable details in the interview. The interview aired on TruNews Radio 6/9/2011.. -

obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/06/debt-collector-michelle-o..

www.ObamaReleaseYourRecords.com -

www.BirtherReport.com
1 jaar, 11 maanden geleden door baphomet #34668
Ex-CIA: 'Forged document' released as birth certificate
Gen. Paul Vallely: Congress afraid to probe 'possible felony' over fears of 'black backlash'

Retired Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, the chief of Stand Up America, a national security expert and Fox News contributor, says the "Certificate of Live Birth" released in April by the White House as "proof positive" of President Obama's Hawaiian birth is a forgery, but the FBI is covering the fraud and no one in Congress is willing to tackle the situation because of fears of a "black backlash" if the failings of the nation's first black president are revealed.

In an interview today with Greg Corombos for WND, Vallely, who previously has expressed concerns about whether the Obama administration is in violation of the U.S. Constitution, said, "His actual birth certificate has never been found in Hawaii nor released from Hawaii hospital there, Kapiolani hospital there, if it in fact did exist."

"We've had three CIA agents, retired, and some of their analytical associates look at it, and all came to the same conclusion, that even the long-form was a forged document," Vallely said.



Get the New York Times best-seller "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to be President," autographed by Jerome Corsi, Ph.D.

"No members of Congress will take this on. The word I get out of Washington is that they don't want to challenge this because it would be in fact a felony offense and in some cases may be even treasonous and [they are] afraid of a black backlash from some of the urban areas," Vallely said.




WND Exclusive A QUESTION OF ELIGIBILITY
Ex-CIA: 'Forged document' released as birth certificate
Gen. Paul Vallely: Congress afraid to probe 'possible felony' over fears of 'black backlash'
Posted: June 15, 2011
3:09 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2011 WND



Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely

Retired Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, the chief of Stand Up America, a national security expert and Fox News contributor, says the "Certificate of Live Birth" released in April by the White House as "proof positive" of President Obama's Hawaiian birth is a forgery, but the FBI is covering the fraud and no one in Congress is willing to tackle the situation because of fears of a "black backlash" if the failings of the nation's first black president are revealed.

In an interview today with Greg Corombos for WND, Vallely, who previously has expressed concerns about whether the Obama administration is in violation of the U.S. Constitution, said, "His actual birth certificate has never been found in Hawaii nor released from Hawaii hospital there, Kapiolani hospital there, if it in fact did exist."

"We've had three CIA agents, retired, and some of their analytical associates look at it, and all came to the same conclusion, that even the long-form was a forged document," Vallely said.

Get the New York Times best-seller "Where's the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama Is Not Eligible to be President," autographed by Jerome Corsi, Ph.D.

"No members of Congress will take this on. The word I get out of Washington is that they don't want to challenge this because it would be in fact a felony offense and in some cases may be even treasonous and [they are] afraid of a black backlash from some of the urban areas," Vallely said.

(Story continues below)




"But that's a very poor excuse for not taking necessary steps to make sure this president in fact is a legitimate president under Article 2 and he is a born U.S. citizen."

The departments of government designed to uncover wrongdoing, in this case, are on the wrong side, he said.

"I think they're (the FBI) covering for this administration. I think the corruption within this administration is so proliferated through the agencies of government now, we're just in a bad situation here. I think the lack of confidence in our government is growing and many feel that not only all the members of Congress but even our courts are corrupted at this time," he said.

The questions over Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office under the requirements in the Constitution that call for a "natural born citizen" have been raised since before he was elected.



Numerous lawsuits have been filed and challenges organized but none have uncovered Obama's documentation. For most of the past few years, his supporters relied on an online image of a Hawaiian short-form "Certification of Live Birth" as proof of his Hawaiian birth, claiming it was the only documentation available from the state.

However, just as the New York Times best-seller, "Where's the Birth Certificate: The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President," by Jerome Corsi, Ph.D., was about to be released, Obama dispatched a private attorney to Hawaii to fetch the supposed long-form "Certificate of Live Birth" and explained that the record now would include the full documentation available from Hawaii.

The original hard-copy birth document, whatever it actually is, has never been seen by the public.



Corsi told WND, "The list is growing of those openly acknowledging the Obama long-form birth certificate released by the White House on April 27 is a forgery.

"That former CIA agents are beginning to weigh in on the White House forgery is important. Too many experts remain afraid to speak out about what is an obvious forgery, fearful that openly speaking out against Obama will hurt their income. That Gen. Vallely has now spoken out shows the cracks are widening around the White House façade that the Obama birth certificate is a legitimate document."

He said, "Vallely is right in saying that millions of Americans are still trying to find out who Barack Obama is.

"The cover-up in Hawaii is still continuing. Every professional forensic document examiner knows the best evidence of the Obama long-form birth certificate is not the electronic Adobe file released on the White House website, but the original document the Hawaii DOH is still hiding in its vault, unwilling to let the public see it with their own eyes. Why won't the White House allow a team of independent professional forensic document examiners inspect and authenticate the original birth certificate document? It makes no sense — unless of course there is no long-form birth certificate in the Hawaii DOH vault."

When Obama released the purported long-form certificate, officials in the Hawaii Department of Health and governor's office refused to simply confirm to WND that the image being presented by Obama was an accurate representation of the records maintained by the state.

Vallely said the document should "thoroughly be analyzed by resident FBI officials and analysts to determine if in fact and validate whether it's forged or real."

"One of the apparent flaws in that document was they listed Kenya as the place of birth of Obama's father, but Kenya was not an established country at that time," he noted.

"There's still a lot of controversy about it, and some of us would just like to have this thing clearly authenticated."

He also cited one of the many issues raised by document experts who have challenged the "birth certificate's" authenticity – the layering in the Adobe computer file.

And Vallely said he knows some would not be satisfied with anything the Obama administration would release, which is a problem, in itself, for the White House.

"That's true, because they don't believe he is eligible. You have a fairly growing contingent out there."

Vallely also made similar statements in an online radio program in which he supported Lakin, the Army doctor who refused orders because neither the military nor the White House would document Obama's eligibility. He spent five months in Fort Leavenworth and only recently was released. His comments start at about 3:30 of the YouTube video:



There, Vallely said, "Obama's birth certificate – I've had retired CIA agents and other investigators go over the birth certificate that was produced and by far, 10 out of 10 have said it's a forgery. So we still have that corruptness going on in the White House. There's a great number of organizations and people still trying to find out who Barack Obama is, where he was born, what his legitimacy is as president of the United States. We know for sure that the Constitution has been violated in Article 2, particularly when you look at the natural-born status."

Only one day earlier, officials in the state of Hawaii claimed that the original of the Obama 'birth certificate' document – the document posted online by the White House – remains "confidential" and cannot be produced in response to a subpoena in a lawsuit over Obama's legitimacy.

The image released by Obama has been challenged by a number of document imaging analysts as a fraud, and it doesn't align with descriptions of it by Obama supporters.

For instance, two weeks before Obama finally released his "long-form birth certificate," Hawaii's former Health Department chief Chiyome Fukino – the one official who claimed to have examined the original birth document under lock and key in Hawaii – was interviewed by NBC News' national investigative correspondent Michael Isikoff, who reported that Fukino told him she had seen the original birth certificate and that it was "half typed and half handwritten."

However, the document released by the White House was entirely typed. Only the signatures and two dates at the very bottom were "handwritten." What Fukino described apparently is a different document from what Obama released to the public.


Bron: www.wnd.com/?pageId=311433#ixzz1PP4vUcm7
Lees meer...

Bespreek dit artikel
Je moet inloggen of registreren om deel te nemen aan deze discussie.
Gelezen 2359 keren
Gepubliceerd in COMPLOTTEN / ETC.
Tags
  • Geboortecertificaat
  • obama
  • nep
  • fake
  • cia
  • 61
Sociale links
  • Add to Google Buzz
  • Toevoegen aan Facebook
  • Toevoegen aan Delicious
  • Digg this
  • Toevoegen aan Reddit
  • Toevoegen aan StumbleUpon
  • Toevoegen aan MySpace
  • Toevoegen aan Technorati

Gerelateerde artikelen (op tag)

  • Het SoFi Nummer van Obama
  • Egyptische sporen in Australië
  • Super Bowl
  • Vaagvliegers Week 4
  • Het monster van Loch Ness
Meer in deze categorie: « NASA, LOFAR en CERN Raar weeQje... »
terug naar boven

Algemeen

  • Nieuws / Discussie
  • Politiek / Oorlog
  • Economie / Banken
  • TV / Films / Docus
  • Muziek
  • Sport
  • PC / Web
  • Gezondheid / Voeding
  • Haatbaarden &zo

Informatief

  • Archeologie
  • Boeken
  • Geschiedenis
  • Gnostiek / Religie
  • Nasa
  • Natuur / Astronomie
  • Techniek
  • Vrije Energie
  • Wetenschap

Dark Side

  • Alchemie
  • Broederschappen
  • Complotten &zo
  • Ghost Busters
  • Kabbalah
  • M3T2
  • Nazi's
  • NWO / Illuminati
  • Occult / Darkside

Dark Side

  • Paragnosten &zo
  • QFF Chaos
  • Satanisme
  • Symbolen &zo
  • Tempeliers
  • Tuig von Oranje
  • UFO'S / ET
  • Wereld Geheimen
  • KinderneuQers

QFF Dossiers

  • 911
  • Fuck BP
  • Libië / QadaFFi
  • Grote Brand Moerdijk
  • Fukushima
  • Snelwegschutter
  • John Titor
  • Joris Demmink
  • Mallona / paNique
  • Niburu / Anton Teuben

Overig

  • Beschaving & Spiritualiteit
  • DUMP!
  • Games
  • Overig
  • Strictly QFF
  • QFF Qontest
  • Sociologie & Samenleving
  • Waar te beginnen?
  • Over QFF
  • F.A.Q.'s
  • Contact
Quo Fata Ferunt - QFF - De ECHTE Illuminati © 1119 - 2013 Design: Jeug Creatief Reclamebureau



  • Wachtwoord vergeten?
  • Gebruikersnaam vergeten?
  • Registreer
*
*
*
*
*

* Verplicht veld