Quo Fata Ferunt! QFF! Die ECHTE Illuminati shit... Welkom in de Hel! - complotten, ufo's, karma, illuminati, nonsens, wetenschap, kennis en verlichting! QFF

In this film, competitors are asked to ‘love someone as hard as they can’ while being brain scanned with the prize going to the person with the greatest amount of brain activity.It was intended to be a public outreach piece, to help raise awareness that science can be beautiful (in the hopes of advancing interest in science).

vimeo.com/33698394

DAMN die Morgan Ninti

www.sheldrake.org/B&R/videostream/index.html#morphogenetics

via: www.grenswetenschap.nl/permalink.asp?i=8761

www.deredactie.be/cm/vrtnieuws/mediatheek/programmas/terzake/2.19975/2.19976/1.1226597

combi schreef:


Wat zegt dit eigenlijk..
En (met name) wat zegt dit voor het electric universe 'model'

Dat je ziet wat je wil/kan zien in het universum (je spiegelt je geest in de materie) en er telkens wel iemand is die net iets anders nieuws bedenkt.
Voor electric universe 'model' geen idee hoe en of dit de combineren valt met wat 'men' nu denkt


nova schreef:

Power to the pieper!
Hollandse aardappelen liggen weg te rotten in de schuren, terwijl er massaal aardappelen in het buitenland worden gekocht. Om de aandacht daar op te vestigen werden er vandaag 6 ton aardappelen gedumpt op de Dam en konden die gratis meegenomen worden.

via: www.hetkanwel.net/2012/04/17/bizarre-trend-boeren-geven-hun-voedsel-gratis-weg/

Joris Lohman, voorzitter van de Youth Food Movement, zei het volgende over de gratis aardappelen: “Eten in de supermarkt is goedkoop, maar heeft ook zijn waarde verloren. Hoe kan het dat 1500 ton aardappelen geen cent waard is? En dat er nu al piepers uit Israel en Cyprus in de winkel liggen? Ik kan het snappen, maar wil het niet begrijpen. Het is een verspillend systeem, en de boer is de dupe. Laten we nadenken over waar ons voedsel vandaan komt!”

En ik maar denken dat moslimgeloof pure liefde is

www.liveleak.com/view?i=f03_1330829653

Mijn versie van het concept taalmatrix, simpel gezegd vocabulaire. Impliceert wel je totale denk opties aan communicatie.

www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2012/apr/19/doctor-research-fraud-us-deserves-sympathy

Doctor who admitted research fraud in the US deserves our sympathy

Peter Francis was a victim of a funding system that demands the answer before it will pay you to ask the question:

The US government's Office of Research Integrity this week issued the summary of a scandal that has been percolating for nearly a year. Peter J Francis, a British medical doctor and PhD, had applied for a grant using fabricated data.

If a journalist had caught him, of course, he'd have got a severe kicking. "Exposed: scandal of eye doc fraud". Nice one. But with the luxury of reflection, the knee-jerk reaction is misguided. Francis didn't deserve a perp walk. He was a victim.

Think about his world, filled with anonymised data that can be fiddled. And fiddled it is. At a conference organised three months ago by the BMJ and the UK Committee on Publication Ethics, for example, a survey reported that 6% of British scientists (anonymously) admitted research fraud, and 13% said they'd witnessed it done.

Given inevitable under-reporting, you might think "everyone's at it". Now go back to Francis's world. Such is the level of competition, and the rising demand for "translation" into commercial products, a rational researcher might conclude: "I'm forced to do the same." The alternative is to lag behind and lose out.

Indeed, Francis's fraud has a perverse logicality in the face of a paradox first spotted before Socrates. Sometimes funders want the answer before they'll pay to ask the question. The word "hunch" scores poorly with reviewers.

This is a modern model of inquiry, less driven by ambition and curiosity than by fear of short-term failure. I'd be happy if Francis mailed me to say otherwise, but the way I see it he likely felt boxed-in: on someone's budget, facing rivals, with urgent work to do.

And his work was important, searching for cures from which millions might benefit. The Foundation Fighting Blindness certainly thought so, helping to fund his research. This was a scientist who deserved to be protected, both from the crueller demands of research and from himself.

The remedy, in my view, will begin with recognising a truth: that science isn't particularly special, or specially honest. So I say: level the playing field with research police and lab inspections, so those like Francis can relax rather than cheat.

voor hele artikel zie link boven

Cosmic rays: the truth is still out there… somewhere

New research carried out beneath the Antarctic ice has dealt a blow to a favourite cosmic ray theory

One hundred years after they were first discovered, cosmic rays are still giving scientists headaches. Observations made at the IceCube neutrino observatory at the south pole, and published in Nature last week, appear to have eliminated a favoured possible source for the most intensely energetic types of these extraordinary emanations.

Cosmic rays are subatomic particles, mostly protons, that hit the upper atmosphere with a wide range of energies and trigger showers of other particles that stream down to the ground. They are thought to be responsible for about 10-15% of the natural background radiation that we experience on Earth.

Scientists have traced the multiple origins of most cosmic rays – the sun is a major emitter, for example – but despite struggling with the problem for 100 years, they have been unable to establish the source of the most energetic versions. These cosmic rays are more than a million times more energetic than the particle beams produced by the largest accelerators and two major possible sources have been put forward to account for their existence. The first idea involves supermassive black holes in the centres of galaxies. The second proposes that gamma ray bursts, the most powerful blasts in the universe – which occur when huge, very distant supernovae explode and emit gigantic gamma ray eruptions – are responsible. This latter theory was a particular favourite for many scientists.

But now a major investigation involving satellite telescopes and observatories built beneath the Antarctic ice has dashed these hopes. Theorists had made it clear that gamma ray bursts would also give off particles called neutrinos when they erupted. So researchers at the IceCube neutrino telescope went looking for signs of neutrinos that arrived at the same time that gamma ray bursts had been detected by the Fermi and Swift space telescopes.

Situated at the south pole, IceCube consists of more than 5,000 optical sensors buried across a cubic kilometre of glacial ice, each looking for the brief blue flash of light produced when a neutrino strikes an atomic nucleus in the ice. Between mid-2008 and mid-2010, around 300 gamma ray bursts were recorded – but IceCube detected no neutrinos associated with them. "After observing gamma ray bursts for two years, we have not detected the telltale neutrinos," said study co-author Francis Halzen at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Thus only supermassive black holes remain as viable candidates to account for ultra-high energy cosmic rays. However, searches at IceCube to find neutrinos from them also remain inconclusive.

The mystery, and the high-tech apparatus being used to solve it, would have delighted Victor Hess, the discoverer of cosmic rays in 1912. In those days it was assumed that the background radiation levels that were measured on the ground would decrease as altitude increased. Hess investigated and in a series of highly dangerous balloon voyages that reached altitudes up to 5.3km he measured radiation levels and found that after an initial brief decrease they increased considerably the higher he went. Hess concluded radiation was penetrating the atmosphere from outer space. His discovery, which won him the Nobel prize in physics in 1936, is still making ripples.

www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/apr/22/cosmic-ray-supernova-research-antarctica

ninti schreef:


syncje??...

www.quofataferunt.com/index.php?option=com_kunena&func=view&catid=40&id=622&limit=15&limitstart=30&Itemid=120#54055

Tech tycoons in asteroid mining venture

Google bosses Larry Page and Eric Schmidt join Avatar director James Cameron in megamillion-dollar plan to make sci-fi reality


A group of hi-tech tycoons including Google's Larry Page and Eric Schmidt have teamed up with explorer and film-maker James Cameron in a venture to mine nearby asteroids, hoping to turn science fiction into real profits.

The megamillion dollar plan is to use commercially built robotic ships to squeeze rocket fuel and valuable minerals such as platinum and gold out of the rocks that routinely whizz by Earth, with the aim of having a space-based fuel station up and running by 2020.

The target-hunting telescopes would be tubes only a couple of feet long, weighing only a few kilograms and small enough to be held in your hand. They should cost less than $10m (£6.2m), company officials said.

The idea that asteroids could be mined for resources has been around for years. Asteroids are the leftovers of a failed attempt to form a planet billions of years ago. Most of the remnants became the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, but some pieces were pushed out to roam the solar system.

Asteroids are made mostly of rock and metal, and range from a few metres wide to nearly 10 miles long. The new venture targets the free-flying asteroids, seeking to extract from them the rare earth metals that are used in batteries, electronics and medical devices, Diamandis said.

Water can be broken down in space to liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen for rocket fuel. However, water is very expensive to get off the ground, so the plan is to take it from an asteroid to a spot in space where it can be converted into fuel. From there, it can easily and cheaply be shipped to Earth orbit to refuel commercial satellites or spaceships from Nasa and other countries.

voor hele artikel : www.guardian.co.uk/science/2012/apr/24/tech-tycoons-asteroid-mining-venture

Zie ook interactieve uitleg : www.guardian.co.uk/science/interactive/2012/apr/24/asteroid-mining-how-work-interactive