Quo Fata Ferunt! QFF! Die ECHTE Illuminati shit... Welkom in de Hel! - complotten, ufo's, karma, illuminati, nonsens, wetenschap, kennis en verlichting! QFF

This x-ray image of the churning interior of the Crab Nebula, taken by the Chandra X-ray Observatory, reveals both a wheel-like formation and an axial jet spanning light years. Gravitational theory never envisioned such a configuration.
Credit: NASA/CXC/SAO/F.Seward et al

The Consensus and the Crab
Aug 27, 2010

As new telescopes have peered into the internal engine of the Crab Nebula, they have revealed astonishing structure and energy levels — a surprise to astronomers, but no surprise to electrical theorists.

Gravity is a weak force, and it can generate only a dribble of energy. Yet throughout the universe we see floods of energy. The consensus of opinion among astronomers is that the energies of the universe can only come from gravitational mechanisms. Because the force of gravity, and therefore its energy, is directly related to mass, the floods of energy require enormities of mass.

Because the consensus opinion holds that magnitude of mass is equivalent to amount of matter, many of the floods of energy require more matter than can fit into the observed sizes of their sources. Consensus opinion takes recourse in boosting densities: by ignoring all that is known empirically and much that is known theoretically about the compression of matter, the consensus opinion can believe that however much matter is needed can be crammed into the available volume.

The coincidence of such super-densities with the requirements for gravitational production of observed energies is accepted as prima facie proof that the consensus opinion is, in fact, a fact, despite the circular reasoning.

This is the fact that makes the central star in the Crab Nebula’s inner x-ray structure (above image) a pulsar. The press release for this new image states matter-of-factly: “The nebula is powered by a rapidly rotating, highly magnetized neutron star, or pulsar (white dot near the center). The combination of rapid rotating [sic] and strong magnetic field generates an intense electromagnetic field that creates jets of matter and antimatter moving away from the north and south poles of the pulsar, and an intense wind flowing out in the equatorial direction.”

A neutron star has so much matter squeezed into it that the electrons have been squeezed into the nucleus to combine with the protons there and form neutrons. The uncharged neutrons are then packed together, as congested as commuters at rush hour. The pulsations of the pulsar are attributed to a hot spot on its surface that sends a flash of radiation with each rotation of the star. Its operation is analogous to a lighthouse light, back when such lights were mechanically rotating devices, before they were converted to electrically pulsed lamps.

The Crab Nebula’s pulsar pulses 30 times a second. This would mean that the star rotates 30 times a second. This would mean that the centrifugal force is stronger than the star’s gravity … which would mean that the star tore itself apart a long time ago, except that consensus opinion crammed in additional matter to bump up the mass sufficiently to increase the gravitational force enough to hold it together.

Of course, another possibility, one not considered by consensus opinion, is that, as with modern lighthouses, electrical oscillations make the pulsar blink. Super-dense matter and super-fast rotation aren’t needed. The x-ray structure—the jets and rings and sharp boundaries of the diocotron instability around the periphery—are common characteristics of plasma discharges … as is the strong magnetic field, the origin of which consensus opinion neglects to explain. Externally driven electrical circuits provide a unified and coherent explanation that is consistent with electromagnetic theory and laboratory investigations. It’s an explanation that doesn’t require exceptions, circular reasoning, or a consensus of opinion.

Mel Acheson

bron: thunderbolts.info
http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2010/arch10/100827crab.htm

Secrets of the Polar Aurora

by David P. Stern
From talk presented in Anchorage, Alaska, 11 August 2002


Alaska is known as a good place for seeing the polar aurora, also known as "Northern Lights." Originally the phenomenon was named "Aurora Borealis," Latin for "northern dawn," since in the lower 48 states or in mid-Europe it may appear (on the rare occasions when it does) as a glow on the northern horizon, as if the sun was rising from the wrong direction. But the southern hemisphere has the same phenomenon, with the glow coming from the south, so scientists prefer to call it simply the "Polar Aurora."

Most visitors to Alaska never get to see an aurora, because they come in the summer, when skies are rarely dark enough. Alaskans claim that only around August 16 does the sky get dark enough to see stars, which is when aurora stands out. After that date, your best bet is to go to Fairbanks--and since the brightest auroras occur around midnight (or later, due to Alaska's time zone), you might have to stay up a long time. Perhaps it is better then to ask the night clerk at your hotel to ring you up if a good display becomes visible.

Appearance and relation to magnetism

What does it look like? Most often, you see greenish white ribbons stretching across the sky, roughly from east to west, usually with waves in them. In Fairbanks they could be overhead, in northern Norway or Sweden too, sometimes even in Winnipeg. Further south those ribbons tend to be near the northern horizon. And if you look closely at them, you will note that they contain many parallel rays, running across their width (see picture below).

Two things about those rays. One, the bright ones fade while dim ones brighten instead--a bit like flames in a fireplace, and just as mesmerizing. Some auroras are deep red, and these may be just a shapeless glow--or they may have rays, too. And second, the direction of those rays is related to the magnetism of the Earth.



en nog veel meer:
http://www-istp.gsfc.nasa.gov/Education/aurora.htm

Nice stukje! Even fijn om te lezen nu met een dikke spliffidiepaffie d'rbaaaaaaiijjjj

OMFG

Dit is trouwens serieus ernstig:





Dat filmpje is echt weird, de tekst nog maffer...

* WAARSCHUWING VOOR STEENENDE GRAPHICS *



Ohw er zit ook nog muziek bij... OMFG

* RAPIDSHARE ALARM!! *

Komtiedan hoor:

http://rapidshare.com/files/164807338/haunebu.mp3




Ernstig....

Ik weet het niet met al die Nazi's Ufo's Reptilians Galactic Federations enz...

Ok, er zijn een hoop rare dingen gebeurt in WW II en er zijn een hoop wetenschappers verdwenen naar Amerika inderdaad.
Plots was er de diode en de transistor uit het niets, de 'uitvinder' Shotky, kon zelf niet eens uitleggen hoe het werkt, da's op zijn minst opmerkelijk.

Maar toch vertrouw ik die verhalen niet helemaal, het lijkt wel zo uit de koker van de scientology church te komen haha.

Daarom zei ik ook: Ernstig.... Kijk dat ze er mee bezig waren is voor mij bewezen, maar naar Mars in 1945... Nee sorry

Hahaha Jetzt Sofort das luftraum hinein gehen!

Oh ja, er is van alles geprobeerd, en dat gebeurt nu nog steeds volgens mij...

Ik probeer ook wel eens wat

Bijzonder simplistisch, en daarmee dus door eenvoud ontzettend schoon en mooi verwoord!

Die kut-nazi's en steiners ook!

Ieder nadeel heeft zijn voordeel.

De technologische ontwikkeling is wel erg hard gegaan sinds WW II.

Maar het blijft een dikke smerige beerput.

Waar kwam al dat geld vandaan in Duitsland om WW II te starten terwijl ze net helemaal gesloopt waren in WW I ?

Wat overigens een interessante vraag is;

WIE maakt al die filmpjes, en WAAROM ?