[quote="Het Dolle Eland" post=41812]De berichten van
nu.nl en de
Telegraaf zijn verre van compleet.
Hieonder dus een meer plausibel én compleet verhaal. Maar denk erom
lieve kijkbuiskinderen, het is voorlopig nog een
theorie. Daarover natuurlijk meer verder onderaan in deze post....:
..."
Smoke billows up after the first of the two towers of the World Trade Center collapses in 2001 in New York City. A mix of sprinkling system water and melted aluminium from aircraft hulls likely triggered the explosions that felled New York's Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, a materials expert has told a technology conference.
A mix of sprinkling system water and melted aluminium from aircraft hulls likely triggered the explosions that felled New York's Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, a materials expert has told a technology conference.
"If my theory is correct, tonnes of aluminium ran down through the towers, where the smelt came into contact with a few hundred litres of water," Christian Simensen, a scientist at SINTEF, an independent technology research institute based in Norway, said in a statement released Wednesday.
"From other disasters and experiments carried out by the aluminium industry, we know that reactions of this sort lead to violent explosions."
The official report blames the collapse on the over-heating and failure of the structural steel beams at the core of the buildings, an explanation Simensen rejects.
Given the quantities of the molten metal involved, the blasts would have been powerful enough to blow out an entire section of each building, he said.
This, in turn, would lead to the top section of each tower to fall down on the sections below.
The sheer weight of the top floors would be enough to crush the lower part of the building like a house of card, he said.
The aluminium-water scenario would also account for explosions from within the buildings just prior to their collapse that have fuelled conspiracy theories suggesting that the structures had been booby-trapped.
Simensen presented his theory at an international materials technology conference in San Diego, California, and has detailed his calculations in an article published in the trade journal Aluminium International Today.
"The aluminium industry had reported more than 250 aluminium-water explosions since 1980," he said.
In a controlled experiment carried out by Alcoa Aluminium, 20 kilos (44 pounds) of molten aluminium was allowed to react with 20 litres of water, along with a small quantity of rust.
"The explosion destroyed the entire laboratory and left a crater 30 metres (100 feet) in diameter," Simensen said.
By comparison, the aircraft carried 30 tonnes of aluminium into each of the towers, according to his calculations.
Simensen speculates that the two commercial jets were immediately trapped inside an insulating layer of building debris within the skyscrapers.
The debris -- especially plaster, which blocks the transfer of heat -- would have formed a shield protecting the rest of the building.
At the same time, however, it would created a super-hot, oven-like zone around the aircraft, heated by burning fuel.
Aluminium alloy, which in jet hulls also contains magnesium, melts at 660 degrees Celsius (1,220 degrees Fahrenheit). If heated to 750 C (1382 F), the alloy "becomes as liquid as water," Simensen said.
This molten aluminium could then have flowed downward through staircases and gaps in the floor, causing a chemical reaction with water from sprinklers on the levels below.
The mix would immediately boost temperatures by several hundred degrees, releasing combustible hydrogen in the process. Such reactions are even more powerful in the presence of rust or other catalysts, which can boost temperatures to more than 1,500 C (2,700 F).
A meltdown period of 30 to 45 minutes would also be consistent with the timing of the explosions and subsequent collapse of both buildings in relation to the moment of impact.
Simensen said there are lessons to be learned, if his theory is correct, that could help avoid a similar disaster were another skyscraper to be hit by a big jet.
"We could develop means of rapidly emptying sprinkler systems in the floors beneath the point of impact," he said.
Firing a rocket with fire-retardant that could coat the aircraft body could also help prevent metal alloy from melting"...
(c) 2011 AFP
BRON:
www.physorg.com/news/2011-09-theory-collapse-twin-towers.html
******
Okay, een héél duidelijk én plausibel verhaal!
Echter hoe ik ook zoek, ik kan niet dat "beruchte" ontplofte laboratoriumverhaal niet op het internet terugvinden. Maar wél hele andere dingen over ALCOA, daarover later meer.
Het is inderdaad bekend dat aluminium nogal "gevaarlijk" is onder bepaalde omstandigheden. Maar dan moeten de omstandigheden wél optimaal zijn.
Onderzoeken van de brand in de beide torens blijken uit te wijzen dat de temperaturen slechts een héél kort moment héél erg hoog waren. Dat was het moment dat de vliegtuigen dus binnenvlogen en ontplofte. Vanzelfsprekend is dat het moment met de meeste temperatuurontwikkeling geweest, maar ook het moment dat alle potentiële cerosine in rook opging met een enorme zuurstof behoefte. Daarmee de brand dus kort-, hevig-, én intens geweest moest zijn. Zie daarvoor de
TORONTO HEARINGS een paar posten terug.
Er zijn honderden voorbeelden te noemen van zéér hevige (industriële) branden waarbij constructies van metaal én aluminium onder véél langere tijd in brand hebben gestaan - óók dus onder hoge en soms hogere temperaturen. Maar daar dus helemaal géén chemische ontploffingen plaatsvonden na in aanraking komende met gewoon bluswater (sprinklers)!!! Neem ook bijvoorbeeld de bijlmerramp, dat was ook geen kattenpis! Daar werd ook gesproken over temperaturen vér boven de 3000 graden, waarbij zelfs verdamping van vaste materie ter sprake was. Daar werd in eerste instantie ook water als blus-, koelmiddel gebruikt. De bijlmermeer bestaat nog steeds tot de dag van vandaag...
Nog meer vraagtekens:
Het WTC stort zich
kaarsrecht naar beneden, met vrijwel de
snelheid van het geluid!!! Dit zet nog altijd dé grootste vraagtekens. Dat zelfs het tweede gebouw, met
exact dezelfde valbeweging inelkaar zakt. Nog mooier wordt het verhaal als
WTC-7 instort met hetzelfde ballet 
, welke niet eens is getroffen door een vliegtuig!
Als er dus
30 ton vloeibaar aluminium in aanraking komt met een aanzienlijke hoeveelheid water, dan had
héél Manhattan nu één grote krater moeten zijn van 300 meter diep! Okay, overdreven dan....sorry!
Een groot deel van de vliegtuigen én het aluminium is tijdens de explosie verloren gegaan en in snippers BINNEN én BUITEN de gebouwen verdwenen.
Neem nou aan dat er nog dus slechts
1% van het aluminium toch aanwezig bleef, dan praten we nog over
ruim 300 kilo over. Deze 300 kilo, moet dus dan smelten en dus constant de temperatuur boven de 660 graden hebben. Het moet in contact komen met water, wat dus ook niet onmogelijk is, want de sprinklerinstallaties stonden aan (mits die nog intact waren na 45 minuten, met alle aanwezige beschadigingen). Okay BOEM!!!
Maar het is onwaarschijnlijk dat er dus een klont van 300 kg aluminium gelijktijdig smelt en zich verspreidt, omdat de vliegtuigen immers ontploften en dus in duizenden stukjes in de omgeving opging. Dus die resterende snippers van een aannemelijke 300 kilo moeten dus smelten en dus her en der verzamelen. Die smeltende fragmenten, mét de juiste temperatuur moeten weer met water in contact komen en dan dus tot ontploffing komen. Het kan allemaal, maar dan gaat het allemaal véél onregelmatiger en zou zo'n kaarsrechte instorting onmogelijk zijn!
Die pannenkoekenvaltheorie is ook omstreden. Volgens simulaties hadden de gebouwen in veel grovere delen links en rechts moeten instorten.
Ja, ik word weer lacherig

als ik een plausibele redenering moet geven over het
WTC-7 en over simultane ineenstorting van dat gebouw!!??
Goed hoe zit het dan met het
bedrijf ALCOA, dat in de pers benoemd wordt. Dat er dus een
slimme Noor bij
SINTEF werkt is wel duidelijk. Beslist géén kleine piepeltjes en in mijn opzicht verre weg van onpartijdig onderzoek

.
Want wat blijkt nou.....:
Na een beetje oppervlakkig graafwerk blijkt dat
ALCOA bijzonder verwikkeld is in
DOOD en
VERDERF,
CIA en
TOP SECRET...
Top studente komt om bij fietsongeluk....:
www.news.uwa.edu.au/201105303592/life-and-physical-sciences/announcement-new-alcoa-australia-award[/li]
Ik vond ook een link met een
advocaat, betrokken bij ALCOA. Dit persoon bleek omgekomen te zijn bij een
auto ongeluk (link ben ik kwijt)
Natuurlijk beursgenoteerd:
www.reuters.com/article/2011/07/11/us-alcoa-idUSTRE76A5NA20110711
Dan ook nog het logo (Stealth achtig)....:
Goed dan gaan we nu nog een stap verder, in to THE RABBIT HOLE!!!!!! dus CIA, TOP SECRET, NUCLEAIR!!!!!
Onderstaand
SCHOKKENDE fragmenten van een publicatie op het net (ja, gelukkig al op Back Upp)
Want wat wil nou? Aluminiumwinning (ALCOA) en Fluoride gaan hand in hand!!!!
..."
In its ionic state, fluorine is highly toxic. Fluorine bonded to metallic ore in the earth was liberated during the refining process and is difficult-to-impossible to safely dispose. The aluminum refining industry was the biggest and most influential fluoride polluter around 1930, and in America only one company was in the aluminum business: ALCOA...."
..."How does one separate U-235 from U-238? The answer was simple and the key to making nuclear weapons. Du Pont was the acknowledged master of refrigeration, and using fluorine to make a refrigerant was their specialty. The secret to separating the uranium isotopes was somehow turning uranium into a gas, and uranium hexafluoride was born, which is one uranium atom bonded to six fluorine atoms. It is the only known uranium compound that is a gas at near environmental temperatures (its boiling point is 134° F). It is called “Hex” in the industry. From this essay’s chemistry lesson addendum, it should be obvious why that compound had such a low boiling point. Hex is uranium gas, or one could call it radioactive Freon"...
..."Shortly after the farmers sued, the federal government mobilized tremendous resources to counteract the farmers' efforts. Secret meetings were held in Washington DC, attended by everybody from the FDA to the Bureau of Standards to the Justice Department. Why were they meeting? In a recently declassified memo from Colonel Cooper Rhodes of the Manhattan Project, those government agencies were “making scientific investigations to obtain evidence which may be used to protect the interest of the Government at the trial of the suits brought by owners of peach orchards in ... New Jersey.”
If the farmers prevailed in court, America’s entire nuclear program could have been threatened"...
..."Studying the decision-making process that led to dropping the atom bombs, the CIA’s hiring of Nazis, the U.S. military shenanigans, and the activities of the alphabet soup U.S. “security” organizations regularly elicits amazement at how much information is still being kept secret, documents that are more than fifty years old. A researcher discovering a newly declassified document can discover other classified documents. The first document seen can be revealing, but what can be more intriguing are other documents referred to by the original document.
When the researcher tries finding the referred document, he/she can find it still classified"...
..."
Apologists for the secrecy, such as UFO debunker Phil Klass, say that there are legitimate national security reasons for keeping 100% of the information secret that the National Security Agency has on UFOs, for instance.[42]"...
Ex-CIA agent Ralph McGehee, whose bitter experience makes it clear that the government nearly never has a legitimate “security” reason for keeping anything classified, refutes the opinions of establishment apologists. McGehee is far from alone. In a recent interview, ex-CIA operative Mark Phillips stated that the 1947 National Security Act had nothing to do with protecting national security. Phillips stated that everybody who worked under it knew that its true purpose was to “cover crimes. It was not to cover secrets.”[43] Secrecy and deception (lies of omission and commission) are
the handmaidens of self-serving activities, as a cover for dark deeds or in keeping the grip on power and wealth for a select few"...
..."Clinical evidence suggests that (uranium hexafluoride) may have a rather marked central nervous system effect with mental confusion, drowsiness and lassitude as the conspicuous features. It seems most likely that the F [code for fluoride] component rather than the T [code for uranium] is the causative factor."[46]"...
..."The proposal remains classified, as do the research results. Another declassified document dated six months after the proposal orders the research stopped. That sent my head spinning. Right-wingers have been saying for more than fifty years that fluoridation was a plot to numb American brains so they could be easily herded. I had heard for years that fluoride administered to a bull made it docile and easy to handle. I have read repeatedly that both the Nazis and Soviets used it in their prison camps to keep the prisoners’ brains numbed, to make them docile. In his right wing classic Murder by Injection, Eustace Mullins made the case that Alzheimer’s disease is largely caused by the ubiquity of aluminum and fluorine in the nation’s food and water supply. There is increasing evidence for that opinion.[47] Mullins mentioned the Soviet studies from 1940 showing how fluorine in the water supply was helpful in running their Gulag system, with brain-numbed prisoners, attested to by others [48]"...
..."“However, I want to make this very definite and very positive - the real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children’s teeth... The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty. Perkins said that putting fluoride in the water supply eventually numbs the brain, making people easily manipulated. Perkins stated “…any person who drinks fluoridated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person, mentally or physically.[49]"...
..."John Yiamouyiannis, in his influential Fluoride and the Aging Factor, described how the fluorine ion disrupts enzyme activity and attacks DNA and protein. In his theories, backed up by research, the fluorine ion particularly disrupts hydrogen bonds. When chemicals are dumped together, the elements that have a higher bonding affinity will “steal” the bonds from other elements. Because it holds its electrons more tightly than any other element, fluorine forms the smallest negatively charged ions of all the elements, and that small size allows them to go where larger ions cannot. Those fluorine ions can get into the nooks and crannies of larger molecules, such as enzymes and DNA, and wreak biological havoc. Those fluorine ions disrupt weaker bonds in those larger molecules, damaging or destroying the original substance, disabling its biochemical usefulness. The fluorine ion acts similarly to “free radicals” in the body, with its net electrical charge interfering with biochemical reactions. That is how the fluorine ion harms or kills people"....
[b]BRON[/b]....:
www.ahealedplanet.net/fluoride.htm
Tja, wat zal ik nog meer zeggen...... MSM HOERNALISTEN!!!! DOE JULLIE WERK!!!!
Even een voetnoot...: ik bedoel hiermee [b]NIET de JOURNALISTEN[/b] die hun leven wagen aan ECHTE nieuwsfeiten. Ik bedoel NIET de JOURNALISTEN die opgesloten zitten en momenteel worden GEMARTELD vanwege de uitermate moedige drang om verslag te doen met betrekking tot de humanitaire wandaden van de elitaire mystieke wanorde![/quote]
[center]****************[/center]
[b]Heb ik zojuist de docu-film "Inside Jobb" zitten kijken.. MUST SEE!!!
Komt toch dat ALCOA verhaal weer eens eventjes inbeeld WTF!!!![/b]
www.quofataferunt.com/index.php?option=com_kunena&func=view&catid=75&id=47973&Itemid=120#48029