Toasted Cars

Alles over de aanslagen van 11 september 2001 en de verstrekkende gevolgen voor alle mensen op deze aardkloot.
Gebruikersavatar
combi
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
Berichten: 16024
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

Thanks voor die filmpjes nexion er zijn er al zoveel weg gepoetst die op al die pagina's van hun stonden, en ik heb nog niet eens 1/10 van al die info kunnen lezen laat staan begrijpen.

Gebruikersavatar
fr3bzy
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
Berichten: 2674
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:12

bron ats

Afbeelding
#WWG1WGA #NaClO2
Gebruikersavatar
combi
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
Berichten: 16024
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

[quote=""fr3bzy" post=51166"]bron ats

Afbeelding[/quote]
Look at the following image taken from toy advertising

(a) Identify one gender stereotype shown in the image. [1]
. .
(b) Explain how the media may socialise children into gender roles. [5]
. .
(c) Explain two ways in which families may socialise their children into gender roles. [4]

eeehhhh jongens spelen met vliegtuigjes voordat ze terrorist worden en in torens vliegen en dat doen ze omdat ze eigenlijk verlieft zijn. :woohoo:


Gebruikersavatar
combi
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
Berichten: 16024
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

No Big Boeing Theory (NBB)

At the heart of the 9/11 fiction, we were told that, using only boxcutters, Arabs hijacked four airliners and crashed them in designated locations? Jones sees no real problems with this story. He is hostile to the "no big boeing theory" (NBB), the theory that no Boeing 767 airliners went into either WTC tower, and no Boeing 757 airliners went into the Pentagon or the Shanksville covered strip mine. Advocates usually allow for missiles or other air vehicles flying about, including unmanned (UAV’s), or even smaller planes. Jones’ motivation is unclear, but he applies no physics to the events and fails to study the physical evidence associated with the alleged crashes. An objective scientist, for example, would review data like this silhouette of passage in WTC 1:

Afbeelding
22A: Silhouette of passage by invincible Boeing 767?

Afbeelding
22B: Silhouette of passage by Invincible RoadRunner. Hmmmmmm!?

Afbeelding
22C: Beep! Beep!

No airplane debris was visible in the gash and no verified debris was knocked to the ground below the impact wall. Consider the conspicuous right wing tip mark. If the Roadrunner can fly through an Acme steel plate, a Boeing can too, right? The aluminum airliner nose crashed into the steel wall and five steel/concrete floors, remaining intact. The fuselage disappeared far inside the gash without deformation, no torsion (twisting) and forward wing momentum no greater than the fuselage, despite stout resistance from the tower. In truth, with no direct resistance from the building and powered by full throttle engines, wing momentum would tear the wings from each suddenly-decelerating fuselage. Wing spars are built of strong but brittle forged aluminum and must break off. But back to the government-media fairy tale: As each wing root and its jet fuel and heavy undercarriage crashed into walls and floors, no fuel spilled out and nothing burned across the face of the building, all fuel being carried inside. Since 767 wings are swept back about 35 degrees, each intact wing had to sever steel columns and spandrel belts sequentially over milliseconds, each aluminum forward edge effectively "sawing" through steel columns/belts and steel-reinforced concrete floors with nothing breaking off. Amazing! Despite no structural connection to the main spar, the right wing tip in question survived this assault and then tattooed the aluminum façade, demurely slipping inside each building. Gullible Americans and most American physicists, judging by their silence, join Steven E. Jones in embracing the WTC airplane fiction.

Afbeelding
A C-130, about half the weight of a Boeing 767, hit this 10-story apartment building at approximately the 8th floor in Tehran last December and crumpled outside, throwing debris around and spilling burning jet fuel over the impact wall and inside the building.

Afbeelding
24: Three-pound bird goes mano a mano with aluminum plane and does heavy damage. source

The incurious Jones passes up a treasure trove of data which defy logic and laws of physics:

1: Holes in the towers too small to swallow wide-body 767s.
2: No plane debris on the ground below the impact holes.
3: No fuel burned below gashes of either tower (Figure 22).
4: No plane debris visible in the gashes, hanging out, nor outside any exit side.
5: Videos showing the same impossible physics, gliding smoothly at 500+ mph through the steel exterior and steel/concrete floors and stopping within a tenth of a second inside, suddenly destroying itself and vanishing with virtually all 3.1 million parts inside.
6: Virtually no airplane debris at any of the four alleged crash sites ("the cleanest crash sites in aviation history" except for evidence planted by government agents) and no time-change parts with serial numbers unique for each aircraft ever identified or proven.
7: As retired software engineer in the aerospace industry Joseph Keith says, "Every video that shows impact shows a plane flying through the tower wall the same way it flies through thin air: no cratering effect, no pushing parts of the building in, no crunching of the airframe as it hits resistance, no reaction from the heavy engines and hidden landing gear, no parts breaking off, no outer 30 feet of the wing breaking off, no bursting, shredding or bending of the wing," "No nothing." The videos are fake.

It is a foregone conclusion for Jones (apparently) that airliners went into the Twin Towers, no questions asked. Even when he discusses demolition, Jones reinforces the plane fiction: "Think of it?just put explosives for (sic) a few upper floors (like where the planes went in)" [pdf (7/19/06) p. 22].". Or, Jones cites Fire Engineering magazine without criticizing its assertion of "structural damage from the planes and explosive ignition of jet fuel" [pdf (7/19/06) p. 40].". Or, "The data as a whole are sufficiently compelling NOW to motivate an immediate investigation of parties, besides the 19 hijackers/Al Qaeda, who might have had a role in 9/11 arson and murders" [pdf (7/19/06) p. 95].".

"Can anyone prove that al Qaeda acted ALONE?" writes Jones, "I have not seen any such proof" (p. 124). The Government never attempted to prove its OBL fiction because it could not. OGCT is the most audacious fraud of all in a history littered with frauds like Operation Northwoods, Gulf of Tonkin incident, Watergate, Iran-Contra, Kuwait baby incubator hoax, Niger yellow cake and Saddam Hussein’s WMD. Rather than research, Jones assumes premises not in evidence. He has the same amount of proof that al Qaeda conducted 9/11 as he has that

No one can prove a lie, not even Steven Jones, hence government cannot prove OGCT.

9/11 was solved on TV within 60 seconds of the second tower event by a Fox News anchor: an instant conspiracy theory
There is no proof of Arab hijackers, for example, no Arab names on passenger manifests
No verified security video tapes (fake of Dulles boarding nearly three years later)
AA flights 11 and 77 were not in BTS data base
Saddam Hussein did it.

"Did a faction in the government know about the hijackers’ pending attacks beforehand?" [pdf (7/19/06) p. 124]." Jones asks. The professor is clueless or a disinformation agent. He refers to pre-9/11 intelligence warnings that are disinformation, thereby echoing the blood libel that 9/11 was done by Arab hijackers. Jones defends the 9/11 Commission’s conventional air defense "breakdown" story. It is nonsense to make such statements backing the OGCT without looking at or conducting scientific research on these issues.

When Jones defends the WTC airliner story, he cites soft evidence like videos, "many, many eyewitnesses," unverified flight data recorders, an alleged consensus of Scholars’ (capital "S") in favor of airliners and calls for release of evidence (who but the government could object?). Jones says videos "clearly show the commercial jet liner." Doh! You mean the perps would fake a video and NOT show a jet liner? The question is, do the pixels reflect reality or is the jet liner image inserted? In NFL broadcasts, the first-and-ten line is inserted in real time, as are billboards at NBA and MLB games, even customized by region. At the Winter Olympics, TV trickery inserted the flag of each speed skater’s nation under the ice and then switched it in real time as the skaters switched lanes. Truly remarkable.

Since he is no video expert, the clueless professor might ask himself if the Newtonian laws of motion still prevailed on 9/11. If so, then the videos are fake. But he answers, "many, many witnesses." Even if we granted many, many for the sake of argument, so what? One day in the past, many, many witnesses saw the earth was flat and five years ago many, many saw the psy-op on TV, including those who allegedly saw an airliner hit a tower from the street below or a skyscraper. Jones lays it on extra thick about eyewitnesses because once the videos are exposed for the fakery they are, that is what he and the government have left as proof.

To sketch in a refutation of eyewitness accounts, first, most people in the "canyons" of lower Manhattan could not see a plane if it smacked into a tower at 500+ mph, and many said so. A plane at 500 mph would cover a 60’-wide street and its sidewalks within a tenth of second. Second, many witnesses heard no jet and most of the video sound tracks record no jet liner booming at incredibly high speed and low altitude. South tower penetration is silent in videos. Third, witness testimony is notoriously unreliable and fungible.[archived version] Fourth, people lie (the perps hired actors, along with a script for complicit media). Fifth, physical evidence ranks number one with prosecutors and scientists while eyewitness testimony ranks lower, certainly no higher than second. A physics professor should exhibit more interest in physical evidence than hearsay inadmissible in court.
AA airliner tail numbers N334AA and N644AA not FAA-deregistered until January 14, 2002
United airliner tail numbers N612UA and N591UA not deregistered until September 28, 2005
"In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper either here in the United States or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere that mentioned any aspect of the September 11 plot," stated FBI Director Mueller. He claimed that the attackers used "extraordinary secrecy" and "investigators have found no computers, laptops, hard drives or other storage media that may have been used by the hijackers, who hid their communications by using hundreds of pay phones and cell phones, coupled with hard-to-trace prepaid calling cards." [Federal Bureau of Investigation, 4/19/2002; Los Angeles Times, 4/22/2002]
On June 6, 2006 the FBI stated that OBL is not wanted for 9/11 because the FBI has "no hard evidence" that he was involved
The U.S. government refuses to authenticate the December 13, 2001, bin Laden "confession video."
Mainstream media reported as many as ten of the accused hijackers alive after 9/11 (Hamza Alghamdi, Saeed Alghamdi, Salem Alhazmi, Ahmed Alnami, Abdulaziz Alomari, Mohand Alshehri, brothers Waleed M. Alshehri and Wail Alshehri, Mohammed Atta, Khalid Almidhdhar) and Majed Moqed was last reported seen in 2000.
Expressing uncertainty over the identity of the accused hijackers on September 20, 2001 FBI Director Mueller said, "We have several others that are still in question. The investigation is ongoing, and I am not certain as to several of the others" [Newsday, 9/21/2001]. On September 27, after revelations in the media about live hijackers, FBI Director Mueller responded, "We are fairly certain of a number of them." [South Florida Sun-Sentinel, 9/28/2001]. On November 2, 2001 Mueller stated, "We at this point definitely know the 19 hijackers who were responsible," and said that the FBI would stick with the names and photos released in late September [Associated Press, 11/3/2002].
Gebruikersavatar
combi
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
Berichten: 16024
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

Afbeelding
A


Afbeelding
25(a): Landing gear amid dust, adjacent to old scaffolding, not on a street corner, close to curb, just left of the mid-point of a dusty Greco-Roman pillar lying in the gutter.

Afbeelding
25(b): Landing gear amid dust, adjacent to old scaffolding, not on a street corner, close to curb, just left of the mid-point of a dusty Greco-Roman pillar lying in the gutter. The crime-scene ribbon is oriented differently and the axel hanging over the curb more than in Fig. 25(a). cut from picture A

Afbeelding
25(c): Landing gear on a dust-free street corner near shiny new scaffolding, set back from the curb and no Greco-Roman pillar visible. The tire and brakes look different too. Note the failure surface of the shaft. It's sharp, not appearing to have bounced around on the pavement. It also appears to be a torsion failure. How can an explosion cause that?

Afbeelding
25(d): Landing gear in new photo op: tire looks in better health, no extensive dust, new scaffolding, further from the corner, further forward toward the top of a dust-free Greco-Roman pillar. We suspect tampering with evidence J . Actors gape (no one walking on their way, a suitcase on the morning of 9/11?) at nice tire and shiny shaft, wondering why the tire, brake housing and shaft would be unburned despite ejection through a "jet fuel conflagration" high atop a tower

Afbeelding
25(e): This piece also has an affinity for canopy-covered scaffolding.

Afbeelding
25(f): And yet another view.

Scrutiny of alleged eyewitness testimony, however, may not be entirely worthless. As far as we can tell, there is a dearth of testimony from disinterested witnesses affirming airliner flights into the WTC towers. Consider the first plane that allegedly flew into the North Tower: many thousands of people in Central Park plus northbound drivers, passengers and pedestrians along First, Second and Third Avenues, Lexington Avenue, Park Avenue, Madison Avenue, Fifth Avenue, Avenue of the Americas, Broadway, etc., would have seen a low-flying AA Boeing 767 thundering south/southwest down the island of Manhattan. At high speed it would have been incredibly noisy, extraordinary and scary. It would have echoed down the canyons. The direction or source may not have been obvious at first. At 400+ mph the jetliner would have taken approximately one minute to fly less than seven miles from just north of Central Park into the North Tower, plenty of time for witnesses to see and track a plane go by but not hit the tower. Thousands of disinterested eyewitnesses could have confirmed a Boeing 767 flying overhead if the official story were true but I’ve not seen such interviews. The internet lacks credible "street interviews" and the controlled media did not go there. That is a telling fact.

The witnesses offered are usually media people, "anonymous" or those who do not confirm a jetliner flying into a tower at all. From a legal, adversarial point of view, most WTC "eyewitness" testimony in favor of large airliners is highly vulnerable. Get them in court and cross-examine them under oath. That’s a whole new ball game and I strongly suspect that an attorney of the "Gerard Holmgren" variety would crush them. In a traumatic event, people switch into survival mode and their powers of observation become impaired, highly selective, and they are much more susceptible to media manipulation. One telephone caller to Bryant Gumbel of CBS said he just saw beams shoot out from the WTC building followed by "Wait a minute, the radio just reported it was plane parts that flew out of the building, so, I just saw plane parts fly out of the building." Radio is powerful enough but people are most susceptible to visual[pdf] manipulation.[archived version]

CNN, otherwise known as the Complicit News Network, was the lead sled dog that day, quickly set up the party line within minutes. Here is the key to CNN coverage that day: at 8:54 a.m. Sean Murtagh, CNN’s vice president of finance and administration, "witnessed the crash from his nearby office" and tells [CNN Anchor Carol ]"Lin via an on-air phone call that the plane that hit the north tower was a ‘large commercial passenger jet.’" Uh huh. "My office faces south toward…the…what,…where the trade center used to be and… probably caught the last 5-6 seconds of flight of the first plane flying straight into the north tower. Impact, fireball and when it hit, it was like, you got like a thud in your stomach, like did I just see what I just saw?" Sure, sure.

There is a credible eyewitness statement, right? Wrong. Here's what is wrong: first, CNN offices then were at 5 Penn Plaza on W. 33d street, almost three miles north of WTC, a 10-minute ride, not a walk. That’s not "nearby" by our lights. Second, facing south from an office on the 21st floor sounds good but it’s not a good vantage point because the plane would fly by in a flash, too fast to get a real fix on what it was. Third, the plane would take over 20 seconds to arrive at the north tower, not "the last 5-6 seconds of flight" claimed. Murtagh’s timing is off by an order of magnitude. While hugely effective, Murtagh is not credible. Fourth, CNN led its coverage with a report from one of its own executives about a large airliner flying into the North Tower. They did not even have enough respect for the audience to interview a hired actor on the street, instead putting the lie "in plain view" by broadcasting it from a CNN employee. Fifth, Murtagh is a lousy actor, with a flat, disinterested delivery that no appalled American watching an airliner fly into the North Tower could possibly muster.

Ok, let's continue for a bit. Some truth leaks out in early media coverage of a disaster because the controlled media is not entirely controlled down to the reporter level. It's almost amusing how Murtagh's lie is immediately overturned by the first unidentified female witness who insisted the North Tower hit came from inside, and then the second, Jeanne Yurman, who reported a sonic boom. Neither witness confirms Murtagh's report of a large airliner.

Jones should conduct a thorough analysis of the witness testimony before pushing this tower of babel to prove a large airliner crashed into a tower. In any event, witness testimony contrary to the laws of physics is worse than useless. Perhaps our critique will lead him to conduct psychological experiments at BYU.


http://drjudywood.com/articles/why/why_indeed.html
Gebruikersavatar
fr3bzy
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
Berichten: 2674
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:12

volgens mij diggen jullie deze chick wel :P
#WWG1WGA #NaClO2
Gebruikersavatar
combi
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
Berichten: 16024
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

[quote=""fr3bzy" post=51177"]volgens mij diggen jullie deze chick wel :P[/quote]

ja, als nu iemand over een vliegtuig en brand praat ga ik spontaan hoesten en vragen of er wel gestoft word. Om me daarna geheel onopvallend te laten ontvallen "lijkt wel of er een twin tower aan stof hier ligt" kucht uche uche.
Gebruikersavatar
#F#
Prince(ss) of Jerusalem
Prince(ss) of Jerusalem
Berichten: 502
Lid geworden op: vr 17 dec 2010, 23:04

Zelden een vrouw zoveel zinnigs horen zeggen...:ohmy:
Gebruikersavatar
Toxopeus
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
Berichten: 4298
Lid geworden op: ma 15 nov 2010, 19:53

Even een andere vergelijking:

Afbeelding

Merk op dat het toestel wat hierin vloog veel groter was als de vliegtuigen die in de Twin Towers zouden hebben gevlogen. En deze flats in de Bijlmer zijn dan ook nogal armetierig gebouwd.
In de erfenis der eeuwen ligt veel wijsheid opgetast. Ook hier geldt: dwaas is hij die zijn eigen geschiedenis versmaadt.
Gebruikersavatar
Nexion
The One And Only Nexion NWO A.K.A. Next World Order
The One And Only Nexion NWO A.K.A. Next World Order
Berichten: 3018
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:10

Die hele 9/11 geschiedenis is toch echt de Ultieme Weirdness, of niet dan?

Daar zijn dingen bij gebruikt en dingen gebeurd dat ons 'verstand' en inlevingsvermogen voorbij gaat...........

Dayum!

Afbeelding

Nex to USS official: "9/11, are you fucking KIDDING me?"
US official to Nex :"Oh hell yes, you bet we are! Cant't you see?"
Gebruikersavatar
baphomet
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
Berichten: 24872
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 16:08

Explosieven geplaatst in de weken voor 9/11, wat red mercury er bij en andere meuk (nucleaire shizzle) en hoppa, the job is done...

Vervolgens op afstand gaan staan gluren met verrekijkers (in de buurt van de Brooklyn Bridge) en camera's, om die shit op te nemen om de beelden thuis op het hoofdkantoor te kunnen laten zien als bewijs van het feit dat je missie geslaagd is...

Je wordt alleen betrapt tijdens het filmen...

Zeg maar net als die explosies / aanslagen op Israëlische doelen over de hele planeet... Waarvan gezegd wordt dat Iran er achter zit terwijl de politie en India en in Thailand met bewijzen op de proppen zijn gekomen dat de gebruikte explosieven, van een type waren die alleen door de M-055-A(nno)D(omini) en de IDF gebruikt worden...

Oeps... foutje!

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum ... 783964/pg1

En daarom nu dus ook een dooie in Spanje... Of toch niet...??

http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum ... 784703/pg1

:silly:
1119 AD
Gebruikersavatar
combi
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
Berichten: 16024
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

tja bovenste stuk verpulvert met een energie wapen en hier en daar stukken opgeblazen.

Nu bestaan die wapens gelukkig niet of ?? nou ja zo ver zijn 'we' nog niet

:whistle:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 073254.htm

Microwave Steel: Faster, Cleaner, Cheaper

ScienceDaily (Jan. 26, 2004) — The same couch-potato technology that pops your popcorn during a TV commercial can now be used to make steel.

You shouldn't try it at home, however, since it involves heating the raw materials up to 1,000 degrees Celsius, about the same temperature as molten lava.

The feat was accomplished by Michigan Tech researcher Jiann-Yang (Jim) Hwang, who wired together the magnetrons from six garden-variety microwaves into one super-heavy-duty oven and added an electric arc furnace. He then put iron oxide and coal inside. In a matter of minutes, the microwave energy reduced the iron ore to iron, and the electric arc furnace smelted the iron and coal into steel.

The process could give the steel industry the same benefits that a microwave gives the typical family, says Hwang, an associate professor of materials science and engineering and director of Michigan Tech's Institute of Materials Processing.

It's really cheap, and it's really fast.

"With a blast furnace, most of the heat escapes," Hwang says. "It's like the stove in your home, where most of the heat warms your kitchen. It's inefficient. In our microwave, iron oxides can be heated to 1,000 degrees Celsius in one minute, compared to hours for conventional heating."

Microwave technology could cut production costs by as much as 50 percent, Hwang says. In addition to energy savings, it uses coal, eliminating the need for high-cost coke. And the manufacturing process is simple, cutting the number of steelmaking steps in half.

It's also friendlier to the environment, with significant reductions in greenhouse gases and sulfur dioxide emissions.

Industry officials aren't ready to throw their existing technology out the window just yet, but they are taking a close look at the Hwang's invention.

"This could be a promising technology, particularly for helping us reuse byproducts that are currently being discarded," said Mark Conedera, a senior environmental engineer with US Steel Corporation. "We've been supportive of the concept for these value-added uses, and it has significant environmental benefits."

Hwang believes his new technology has the potential to benefit U.S. heavy industry, particularly in the Great Lakes region, where the steel and auto industries are centered.

"A low-cost steelmaking technology would take advantage of U.S. iron and coal resources and could help keep manufacturing jobs in Michigan and throughout the Great Lakes," he said.

Hwang's microwave steelmaking research was supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Energy.

====
:woohoo: gaat weer verder met nieuw artikel in mysteriën reeks enzo

Afbeelding
Gebruikersavatar
combi
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
Berichten: 16024
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

nah kan het niet laten :silly: :

Microwave beam weapon reportedly to be deployed in Iraq
Peter Clarke
9/21/2004 9:43 AM EDT
LONDON — A beam weapon that uses the heating effect of microwaves to cause pain is to be issued to U.S. troops in Iraq, according to a report on the Telegraph Web site.

The supposedly nonlethal weapon, also called "active-denial technology," has been under development throughout the 1990s at the U. S. Air Force Research Laboratory (Kirtland, N.M.), in tandem with the Marine Corps' Joint Nonlethal Weapons Directorate, the report said.

The weapon uses 95-GHz energy to penetrate the skin to 1/64 of an inch, and hits water molecules in the skin to produce an intense burning sensation that stops when the transmitter is switched off or when the individual moves out of the beam.

The weapon has been cited as being particularly useful for crowd control and urban conflicts, although there thought to be counter-measures (see see June 6, 2001, story). "The skin gets extremely hot, and people can't stand the pain, so they have to move — and move in the way we want them to," the more recent report quoted Col. Wade Hall of the Office of Force Transformation as saying. The weapon is set to be fitted to armored vehicles already in Iraq. This would allow the microwave beam weapon to be deployed in 2005, the report said.

U.S. Army and Marine Corps units should receive four to six vehicles equipped with the microwave weapon, dubbed "Sheriffs," by September 2005.

The system includes a millimeter-wave energy source with waveguides to direct the energy to a dish antenna measuring about 3 x 3 meters, which forms a beam that can be swept across a battlefield or hostile crowd. Beam size, whether it is a convergent, focused beam or a divergent beam, and its range, were classified, although the beam has been reported to have a range of about 1 kilometer.

http://eetimes.com/electronics-news/412 ... ed-in-Iraq
Gebruikersavatar
dodeca
Knight of the Sun
Knight of the Sun
Berichten: 1297
Lid geworden op: zo 28 aug 2011, 19:54

Ben net begonnen met kijken dit is deel 2 want begint met toasted cars. Judy gebruikt haar ogen goed laat een politie auto zien die binnen in volkomen uitgebrand is terwijl de plastic lampen boven op het dak niet gesmolten zijn! Hoe langer je erna kijkt hoe vreemder het verhaal wordt:

Gebruikersavatar
combi
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
S.G.I.G. Temple Admin
Berichten: 16024
Lid geworden op: za 21 aug 2010, 21:27

[quote=""dodeca" post=51286"]Ben net begonnen met kijken dit is deel 2 want begint met toasted cars. Judy gebruikt haar ogen goed laat een politie auto zien die binnen in volkomen uitgebrand is terwijl de plastic lampen boven op het dak niet gesmolten zijn! Hoe langer je erna kijkt hoe vreemder het verhaal wordt:

[/quote]

Ik kijk de film nu voor de tweede keer en wat zie ik :ohmy:

Afbeelding

Rond 1uur en 07minuten laat ze zien dat mensen op de 105 geen kleren aan hebben, geen shirts dan.
Boven valt het niet op als ze geen kleren aan hebben want overleven doen ze het niet. Wat 'verdampt' is is ook meer power gebruikt ?


[quote=""dodeca" post=51115"]Dus overal papier want papier werd niet weggezapped. Waarom?

Cellulose is de belangrijkste grondstof voor de productie van het papier, het is een organische stof. Men onderscheidt de cellulose die uit katoenlinters wordt gewonnen en de cellulose die uit hout wordt gewonnen, voornamelijk naaldhout.

Zal te veel opvallen als al die lui zonder kleren stonden om die vallende torens![/quote]
Plaats reactie

Terug naar “9/11”